Nonzero Newsletter
Robert Wright's Nonzero
The Trump-Kamala Debate (Robert Wright & Paul Bloom)
29
Preview
0:00
-48:18

The Trump-Kamala Debate (Robert Wright & Paul Bloom)

29

This episode includes an Overtime segment that’s available to paid subscribers. If you’re not a paid subscriber, we of course encourage you to become one. If you are a paid subscriber, you can access the complete conversation either via the audio and video on this post or by setting up the paid-subscriber podcast feed, which includes all exclusive audio content. To set that up, simply grab the RSS feed from this page (by first clicking the “...” icon on the audio player) and paste it into your favorite podcast app.

If you have trouble completing the process, check out this super-simple how-to guide.

0:00 Tragedy strikes the Wright household
3:56 Breaking down the big Trump-Kamala debate
22:20 Are debates actually valuable?
28:52 Kamala’s worst debate moment (according to Bob)
33:15 Elon vs Taylor Swift, Brazil, and himself
36:55 Bob and Paul argue about free speech
44:54 Heading to Overtime

Robert Wright (Nonzero, The Evolution of God, Why Buddhism Is True) and Paul Bloom (https://smallpotatoes.paulbloom.net, University of Toronto, The Sweet Spot, Against Empathy). Recorded September 11, 2024.

Twitter: https://twitter.com/NonzeroPods

Overtime titles:

0:00 Bob DESTROYS Paul’s take on free speech
4:33 Tucker Carlson’s latest outrage
13:55 (Evo)psychoanalyzing J.D. Vance
20:13 “Raw-dogging”: a new path to mindfulness?
25:41 In defense of Vance’s offensiveness
29:35 Uses and abuses of AI
38:28 Understanding Taylor Swift (Bob’s version)
43:36 Was Pat Buchanan a better MAGA candidate than Trump?
47:33 When Bob was a White House darling
54:31 Commenter film criticism, consciousness, and cognitive empathy
1:00:20 Do we have a “need for chaos”?

This post is for paid subscribers

Nonzero Newsletter
Robert Wright's Nonzero
Conversations with a series of people who have nothing in common except that program host Robert Wright is curious about what they’re thinking.